Preview

Сибирский научный медицинский журнал

Advanced search

Parenteral nutrition through the venous port system in patients with short bowel syndrome (literature review and clinical case)

https://doi.org/10.18699/SSMJ20250324

Abstract

   Introduction. Short bowel syndrome is a rare disease that occurs after the removal of a large part of the small intestine or due to developmental abnormalities in the embryonic period. Such patients need long-term treatment, the vital component of which is parenteral nutrition (PN). PN requires constant vascular access, the problem of choosing which is always an urgent topic due to the risks of various complications. The venous port system is the optimal type of vascular access for PN due to the low level of intraoperative and postoperative complications and ease of operation.

   The aim of the study is to present a clinical case of venous port system implantation and its use as a vascular access for PN of a patient with short bowel syndrome.

   Clinical case. Patient G., 30 years old, with a diagnosis: “Condition after appendectomy on 24.03.2023, laparotomy, adhesiolysis on 30.04.2023. Condition after 9 sanitation relaparotomies for
tertiary peritonitis. Short bowel syndrome (distal): resection of the distal ileum for small intestinal perforations with the formation of a high jejunostomy at a distance of 90 cm from the ligament of Treitz (residual process 90 cm). Intestinal failure type III, malabsorption syndrome stage 2, severe course. Severe protein-energy malnutrition. Hypoalbuminemia, hypoproteinemia”. Surgery was performed in the Clinics of Samara State Medical University: Implantation of the venous port system into the superior vena cava through the right internal jugular vein with the chamber located in the right
subclavian region. He was discharged for outpatient follow-up treatment in a stable condition with positive dynamics.

   Conclusions. The use of the venous port system as an access for PN in severe and asthenic patients with short bowel syndrome minimizes complications, effectively and conveniently provides PN.

About the Authors

A. A. Repin
Сlinics of the Samara State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

Andrey A. Repin

443079; Karla Marxa ave., 165b; Samara



M. A. Melnikov
Сlinics of the Samara State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

Mikhail A. Melnikov, candidate of medical sciences

443079; Karla Marxa ave., 165b; Samara



S. E. Katorkin
Samara State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

Sergey E. Katorkin, doctor of medical sciences, professor

443099; Chapaevskaya st., 89; Samara



S. Yu. Bondarenko
Сlinics of the Samara State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

Sergey Yu. Bondarenko

443079; Karla Marxa ave., 165b; Samara



References

1. Khubutia M.Sh., Popova T.S., Saltanov A.I. Рarenteral and enteral nutrition : national leadership. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. 800 р. [In Russian].

2. Lakkasani S., Seth D., Khokhar I., Touza M., Dacosta T.J. Concise review on short bowel syndrome: Etiology, pathophysiology, and management. World J. Clin. Cases. 2022;10(31):11273–11282. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11273

3. Bielawska B., Allard J.P. Parenteral nutrition and intestinal failure. Nutrients. 2017;9(5):460–466. doi: 10.3390/nu9050466

4. Kuzmina T.N., Nikolskaya K.A., Akhmadullina O.V., Smirnova O.A., Knyazev O.V. Ways to solve the problem of home parenteral nutrition in patients with short bowel syndrome. Problemy sotsial’noy gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny = Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. 2022;30(s1):1050–1054. [In Russian]. doi: 10.32687/0869-866X-2022-30-s1-1050-1054

5. Averyanova Yu.V., Batyrshin E.M., Demko A.E., Ivanova G.E., Ivashkin V.T., Kostyuchenko L.N., Lapitsky A.V., Leiderman I.N., Luft V.M., Maev I.V., … Trukhmanov A.S. Clinical recommendations of the Northwest society for enteral and parenteral nutrition, interregional association for emergency surgery, Russian gastroenterological association, Union of rehabilitation therapists of Russia and Russian transplantation society on diagnosis and treatment of short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure in adults. Rossiyskiy zhurnal gastroenterologii, gepatologii, koloproktologii = Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2022;32(1):60–103. [In Russian]. doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-1-60-103

6. Pironi L., Corcos O., Forbes A., Holst M., Joly F., Jonkers C., Klek S., Lal S., Blaser A.R., Rollins K.E., … ESPEN Acute and Chronic Intestinal Failure Special Interest Groups. Intestinal failure in adults: Recommendations from the ESPEN expert groups. Clin. Nutr. 2018;37(6 Pt A):1798–1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.07.036

7. Höllwarth M.E. Surgical strategies in short bowel syndrome. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2017;33(4):413–419. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-4043-6

8. Buhl N.D., Bourry J., Seguy D., Lescut D. Epidemiology of home enteral and parenteral nutrition in adults: Comprehensive national data. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN. 2024;60(4):79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.01.010

9. Aggarwal L., Sattavan S., Lal R., Sharma D., Borgharia S., Shrivastava N., Alagappan R., Singh R. Short bowel syndrome : an uncommon clinical entity and a therapeutic challenge-our experience and review of literature. Indian J. Surg. 2017;79(4):349–353. doi: 10.1007/s12262-017-1651-x

10. Harpain F., Milicevic S., Howard L., Biedermann P., Pape U.F. Management patterns of teduglutide use in short bowel syndrome: a survey of 70 healthcare professionals. nutrients. 2024;16(21):3762. doi: 10.3390/nu16213762

11. Geng L., Zhou L., Ding G.J., Xu X.L., Wu Y.M., Liu J.J., Fu T.L. Alternative technique to save ischemic bowel segment in management of neonatal short bowel syndrome: A case report. World J. Clin. Cases. 2019;7(20):3353–3357. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3353

12. Grocholski C., Chambrier C., Lauverjat M., Acquaviva C., Abid N., Bergoin C., Guebre-Egziabher F., Bacchetta J., Derain-Dubourg L., de Mul A., Lemoine S. Circulating oxalate levels in short bowel syndrome as a severity marker of CKD. Kidney Int. Rep. 2023;9(3):686–693. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.12.023

13. Lakananurak N. Risk factors for parenteral nutrition-dependence and mortality with the short bowel syndrome: a 10-year retrospective study in Thailand. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018;27(4):770–776.

14. Weimann A., Braga M., Carli F., Higashiguchi T., Hübner M., Klek S., Laviano A., Ljungqvist O., Lobo D.N., Martindale R., … Singer P. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin. Nutr. 2017;36(3):623–650. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013

15. Pironi L., Arends J., Bozzetti F., Cuerda C., Gillanders L., Jeppesen P.B., Joly F., Kelly D., Lal S., Staun M., … Chronic Intestinal Failure Special Interest Group of ESPEN. ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults. Clin. Nutr. 2016;35(2):247–307. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.020

16. Schiffer C.A., Mangu P.B., Wade J.C., Camp-Sorrell D., Cope D.G., El-Rayes B.F., Gorman M., Ligibel J., Mansfield P., Levine M. Central venous catheter care for the patient with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31(10):1357–1370. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.5733

17. Sousa B., Furlanetto J., Hutka M., Gouveia P., Wuerstlein R., Mariz J.M., Pinto D., Cardoso F.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Central venous access in oncology: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26(5):152–168. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv296

18. Machat S., Eisenhuber E., Pfarl G., Stübler J., Koelblinger C., Zacherl J., Schima W. Complications of central venous port systems : a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0770-2

19. Joshi P., Sahu G., Pawar K.S., Gupta V. Aetiology, clinical profile and management outcome of pneumothorax patients: A prospective study from Central India. J. Family Med. Prim. Care. 2023;12(9):2134–2139. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_341_23

20. Loiselle A., Parish J.M., Wilkens J.A., Jaroszewski D.E. Managing iatrogenic pneumothorax and chest tubes. J. Hosp. Med. 2013;8(7):402–408. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2053

21. Gupta A., Zaidi H., Habib K. Pneumothorax after colonoscopy – A review of literature. Clin. Endosc. 2017;50(5):446–450. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.118

22. Shariyate M.J., Kachooei A.R., Ebrahimzadeh M.H. Massive emphysema and pneumothorax following shoulder arthroscopy under general anaesthesia: a case report. Arch. Bone Jt. Surg. 2017;5(6):459–463.

23. Pisano U., Stevenson K., Kasthuri R., Kingsmore D. Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention. CVIR Endovasc. 2024;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00424-4

24. Beathard G.A. Catheter thrombosis. Semin. Dial. 2004;14(6):441–445. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-139x.2001.00109.x

25. Vinson D.R., Ballard D.W., Hance L.G., Stevenson M.D., Clague V.A., Rauchwerger A.S., Reed M.E., Mark D.G.; Kaiser Permanente CREST Network Investigators. Pneumothorax is a rare complication of thoracic central venous catheterization in community EDs. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2015;33(1):60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.020

26. Vesely TM. Air embolism during insertion of central venous catheters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2001;12(11):1291–1295. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61554-1

27. Kehagias E., Galanakis N., Tsetis D. Central venous catheters: Which, when and how. Br. J. Radiol. 2023;96(1151):2022–0894. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220894

28. Evans N.S., Ratchford E.V. Catheter-related venous thrombosis. Vasc. Med. 2018;23(4):411–413. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18779695

29. Dolmatch B.L., Gurley J.C., Baskin K.M., Nikolic B., Lawson J.H., Shenoy S., Saad T.F., Davidson I., Baerlocher M.O., Cohen E.I., … Central Vein Work Group and the Technology Assessment Committee. Society of Interventional Radiology Reporting Standards for Thoracic Central Vein Obstruction: Endorsed by the American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology (ASDIN), British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR), Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (ISVIR), Vascular Access Society of the Americas (VASA), and Vascular Access Society of Britain and Ireland (VASBI). J. Vasc. Access. 2019;20(2):114–122. doi: 10.1177/1129729818791409

30. Schmidli J., Widmer M.K., Basile C., de Donato G., Gallieni M., Gibbons C.P., Haage P., Hamilton G., Hedin U., Kamper L, … Roca-Tey R. Editor’s choice – Vascular access: 2018 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2018;55(6):757–818. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.001

31. Muthukuda C., Suriyakumara V., Samarathunga T., Liyanage L., Marasinghe A. Non-tunneled haemodialysis catheter-related blood stream infections and associated factors among first time haemodialysis patients: a prospective study from a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03726-4

32. Boulet N., Pensier J., Occean B.V., Peray P.F., Mimoz O., Rickard C.M., Buetti N., Lefrant J.Y., Muller L., Roger C. Central venous catheter-related infections : a systematic review, meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and meta-regression comparing ultrasound guidance and landmark technique for insertion. Crit. Care. 2024;28(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05162-0

33. Pironi L., Boeykens K., Bozzetti F., Joly F., Klek S., Lal S., Lichota M., Mühlebach S., Van Gossum A., Wanten G., Wheatley C., Bischoff S.C. ESPEN guideline on home parenteral nutrition. Clin. Nutr. 2020;39(6):1645–1666. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.03.005

34. Epidemiology and prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infections and central venous catheter care. Available at: clck.ru/3M7uUV [In Russian].

35. Poole C., Carlton D., Bimbo L., Allon M. Treatment of catheter-related bacteraemia with an antibiotic lock protocol: effect of bacterial pathogen. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2004; 19:1237–1244

36. Shenep M.A., Tanner M.R., Sun Y., Culley T., Hayden R.T., Flynn P.M., Tang L., Wolf J. Catheter-related complications in children with cancer receiving parenteral nutrition: change in risk is moderated by catheter type. JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(6):1063–1071. doi: 10.1177/0148607115624087

37. Mittal G.S., Sundriyal D., Naik N.B., Sehrawat A. Totally implantable venous access device (chemoport) in oncology: study of 168 polyurethane chemoport catheter system. South Asian J. Cancer. 2021;10(4):261–264. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739041

38. Pomp A., Caldwell M.D., Albina J.E. Subcutaneous infusion ports for administration of parenteral nutrition at home. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1989;169(4):329-333.

39. Zhang L., Wu J. The utilization of guidewires for adjusting the intraoperative catheter malposition during the venous access port implantation: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(45):e40461. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040461

40. Niederhuber J.E., Ensminger W., Gyves J.W., Liepman M., Doan K., Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery. 1982;92(4):706–712.

41. Tabatabaie O., Kasumova G.G., Eskander M.F., Critchlow J.F., Tawa N.E., Tseng J.F. Totally implantable venous access devices : a review of complications and management strategies. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;40(1):94–105. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000361

42. Nakamura T., Sasaki J., Asari Y., Sato T., Torii S., Watanabe M. Complications after implantation of subcutaneous central venous ports (PowerPortⓇ). Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond). 2017;17:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.03.014

43. Machat S., Eisenhuber E., Pfarl G., Stübler J., Koelblinger C., Zacherl J., Schima W. Complications of central venous port systems: a pictorial review. Insights. Imaging. 2019;10(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0770-2

44. Thiel K., Kalmbach S., Maier G., Wichmann D., Schenk M., Königsrainer A., Thiel C. Standardized procedure prevents perioperative and early complications in totally implantable venous-access ports-a complication analysis of more than 1000 TIVAP implantations. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2022;407(8):3755–3762. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02656-9

45. Brindley P.G., Deschamps J., Milovanovic L., Buchanan B.M. Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review. J. Intensive Care Soc. 2024;25(2):190–207. doi: 10.1177/17511437241227739

46. Kim D.H., Ryu D.Y., Jung H.J., Lee S.S. Evaluation of complications of totally implantable central venous port system insertion. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019;17(3):2013–2018. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7185

47. Kartsouni V., Moschouris H., Bersimis F., Gkeneralis G., Gkeli M., Dodoura S., Chouchourelou A., Fezoulidis I., Kotsakis A., Rountas C. Complications of totally implantable central venous catheters (ports) inserted via the internal jugular vein under ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance in adult oncology patients: a single-center experience. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e27485. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27485

48. Walser E.M. Venous access ports: indications, implantation technique, follow-up, and complications. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2012;35(4):751–764. doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0271-2

49. Luft V.M., Demko A.E., Leiderman I.N., Lapitsky A.V., Batyrshin E.M., Sergeeva A.M. Short bowel syndrome in adults: diagnosis and treatment. Saint-Petersburg, 2023. 78 p. [In Russian].


Review

Views: 71


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2512 (Print)
ISSN 2410-2520 (Online)