Gender differences in fetal growth and maternal anthropometry: аn analysis of their impact on newborn weight
https://doi.org/10.18699/SSMJ20250306
Abstract
Anthropometric and fetometric parameters of the fetus, including birth weight, are closely related to pregnancy outcomes and the health status of the newborn. The maternal preconception body mass index (BMI) significantly influences on intrauterine development; however, differential growth characteristics between male and female fetuses are often overlooked in such analyses. At the same time, the child’s sex may significantly modify growth rates, the distribution of muscle and adipose tissue, as well as the response to external factors.
Aim of the study was to determine the patterns of the influence of fetal sex on fetometric parameters, including birth weight, taking into account maternal anthropometric characteristics (BMI and height) and regional peculiarities, in order to optimize perinatal care and improve pregnancy outcomes.
Material and methods. Medical records of 5161 pregnant women treated at the Kirov Regional Clinical Perinatal Center were analyzed. The study considered maternal anthropometric data (body weight, height, preconception BMI) and fetometric data of the newborns (head circumference, abdominal circumference, birth weight). This retrospective study covered the period from 2016 to 2022. Based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the women were divided into three groups according to their preconception BMI: below normal (< 18.5 kg/m²), normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m²), and elevated (25.0–29.9 kg/m²). Pregnant women with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) were excluded. Additionally, a stratified analysis of the newborns by sex was conducted to assess the influence of fetal sex on intrauterine growth.
Results. It was found that, overall, male newborns exhibited higher birth weight, head circumference, and shoulder circumference compared to female newborns, regardless of the maternal BMI group. In the underweight group, infants with lower fetometric parameters were more frequently born; however, the differences between males and females persisted even in this category. In the normal BMI group, children of both sexes had optimal mean birth weights (approximately 3300 ± 400 g), yet male newborns more frequently exceeded the median values. In a group of mothers with elevated BMI group (25.0–29.9 kg/m²), the proportion of infants with a birth weight > 4000 g increased, with male newborns showing even higher values. The statistically significant differences in growth rates between the sexes were evident both in the mean birth weight and in the higher proportion of large-for-gestational-age infants among males. Correlation analysis demonstrated that the combination of fetal sex with maternal preconception BMI and height significantly influences the final fetometric parameters.
Conclusions. In addition to the maternal BMI and height, the newborn’s sex influences on fetometric parameters, including birth weight. Therefore, in perinatal care, in the formulation of dietary recommendations, and in planning the management of pregnancy, it is advisable to consider not only the maternal anthropometry but also the potential differences between male and female fetuses in intrauterine growth patterns.
About the Authors
E. M. IutinskyRussian Federation
Eduard M. Iutinsky, candidate of medical sciences
10027; Karla Marksa st., 11; Kirov
L. M. Zheleznov
Russian Federation
Lev M. Zheleznov, doctor of medical sciences, professor
10027; Karla Marksa st., 11; Kirov
S. A. Dvoryansky
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Dvoryansky, doctor of medical sciences, professor
10027; Karla Marksa st., 11; Kirov
References
1. Li T., He Y., Wang N., Feng C., Zhou P., Qi Y., Wang Z., Lin X., Mao D., Sun Z., … Zong G. Maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and birth weight: a prospective cohort study. Nutr. J. 2024;23(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-01001-8
2. Ugwudike B., Kwok M. Update on gestational diabetes and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023;35(5):453–459. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000901
3. Kazankina A.S., Ushanova F.O. Evaluation of the influence of maternal weight on the course of pregnancy and birth outcomes of fetuses with macrosomia. Endokrinologiya: novosti, mneniya, obucheniye = Endocrinology: News, Opinions, Training. 2023;12(3):20–25. [In Russian]. doi: 10.33029/2304-9529-2023-12-3-20-25
4. Usinina A.A., Postoyev V.A., Odland I.O., Grzhibovskiy A.M. Pregnancy outcomin low-weight women. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya = Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;(12):90–95. [In Russian]. doi: 10.18565/aig.2019.12.90-95
5. Perumal N., Wang D., Darling A.M., Liu E., Wang M., Ahmed T., Christian P., Dewey K.G., Kac G., Kennedy S.H., … GWG Pooling Project Consortium. Suboptimal gestational weight gain and neonatal outcomes in low and middle income countries: individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ. 2023;382:e072249. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072249
6. Mackeen A.D., Boyd V.E., Schuster M., Young A.J., Gray C., Angras K. The impact of prepregnancy body mass index on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. J. Osteopath. Med. 2024;124(10):447–453. doi: 10.1515/jom-2024-0025
7. Hietalati S., Pham D., Arora H., Mochizuki M., Santiago G., Vaught J., Lin E.T., Mestan K.K., Parast M., Jacobs M.B. Placental pathology and fetal growth outcomes in pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.). 2024;48(9):1248–1257. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01546-y
8. Talmo M.S.A., Fløysand I.S., Nilsen G.Ø., Løvvik T.S., Ødegård R., Juliusson P.B., Vanky E., Simpson M.R. Growth restriction in the offspring of mothers with polycystic ovary syndrome. JAMA Netw. Open. 2024;7(8):e2430543. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30543
9. Zhu Y., Zheng Q., Pan Y., Jiang X., Li J., Liu R., Huang L. Association between prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes among Chinese women with gestational diabetes mellitus : a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2024;14(2): e075226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075226
10. Ishitsuka K., Piedvache A., Kobayashi S., Iwama N., Nishimura T., Watanabe M., Metoki H., Iwata H., Miyashita C., Ishikuro M., … Morisaki N. The population-attributable fractions of small-for-gestational-age births: Results from the Japan Birth Cohort Consortium. Nutrients. 2024;16(2):186. doi: 10.3390/nu16020186
11. Allotey J., Archer L., Coomar D., Snell K.I., Smuk M., Oakey L., Haqnawaz S., Betrán A.P., Chappell L.C., Ganzevoort W., … Thangaratinam S. Development and validation of prediction models for fetal growth restriction and birthweight: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Health Technol. Assess. 2024;28(47):1–119. doi: 10.3310/DABW4814
12. Cao W., Li N., Zhang R., Li W., Gao M., Wang H., Wang L., Qiao Y., Li J., Yu Z., … Yang X. Interactive effects of gestational diabetes and high pre-pregnancy body mass index on adverse growth patterns of off-spring. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2024;40(3):e3759. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3759
13. Borges M.C., Clayton G.L., Freathy R.M., Felix J.F., Fernández-Sanlés A., Soares A.G., Kilpi F., Yang Q., McEachan R.R.C., Richmond R.C. … Lawlor D.A. Integrating multiple lines of evidence to assess the effects of maternal BMI on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. BMC Med. 2024;22(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03167-0
14. Steffen H.A., Swartz S.R., Kenne K.A., Wendt L.H., Jackson J.B., Rysavy M.B. Increased maternal BMI at time of delivery associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am. J. Perinatol. 2024;41(14):1908–1917. doi: 10.1055/a-2274-0463
15. Lin L., Lin J., Yan J. Association of maternal body mass index change with risk of large for gestational age among pregnant women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2024;37(1):2316732. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2316732
16. Ruis M., Hoffman K., Stapleton H.M. Brominated flame retardants and legacy organochlorines in archived human placenta samples: Sex differences, temporal analysis and associations with infant birth weight. Chemosphere. 2023;322:138170. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138170
17. Hercus J.C., Metcalfe K.X., Christians J.K. Sex differences in growth and mortality in pregnancy-associated hypertension. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0296853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296853
18. Chatterjee S., Zeng X., Ouidir M., Tesfaye M., Zhang C., Tekola-Ayele F. Sex-specific placental gene expression signatures of small for gestational age at birth. Placenta. 2022;121:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.03.004
19. Paschou S.A., Shalit A., Gerontiti E., Athanasiadou K.I., Kalampokas T., Psaltopoulou T., Lambrinoudaki I., Anastasiou E., Wolffenbuttel B.H.R., Goulis D.G. Efficacy and safety of metformin during pregnancy: an update. Endocrine. 2024;83(2):259–269. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03550-0
20. Bramsved R., Mårild S., Bygdell M., Kindblom J.M., Lindh I. Impact of BMI and smoking in adolescence and at the start of pregnancy on birth weight. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05529-1
21. Botasheva T.L., Rymashevsky A.N., Fabrikant A.D., Petrov Yu.A., Palieva N.V., Andreeva V.O., Lebedenko E.Yu., Khloponina A.V. Features of glycemic status, pro- and contrinsular factors in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus depending on the gender of the fetus. Glavnyy vrach Yuga Rossii = Chief Physician of the South of Russia. 2022;(1):6–9. [In Russian].
22. Rasmussen S., Carlsen E.Ø., Linde L.E., Morken N.H., Håberg S.E., Ebbing C. Paternal and maternal birthweight and offspring risk of macrosomia at term gestations: A nationwide population study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2024;38(3):183–192. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13005
23. Santos M.D., Ferrari G., Drenowatz C., Estivaleti J.M., de Victo E.R., de Oliveira L.C., Matsudo V. Association between breastfeeding, parents’ body mass index and birth weight with obesity indicators in children. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03641-3