Study of the possibilities of non-invasive assessment of increased intracranial pressure according to MRI data on the example of patients with secondary intracranial hypertension

Modern methods of neuroimaging make it possible to develop approaches for assessing intracranial pressure as a replacement for the “gold standard” of invasive monitoring. Aim of the study was to investigate the possibility of using magnetic resonance (MR) characteristics to assess the increase in intracranial pressure in patients with secondary intracranial hypertension. Material and methods. Group 1 – 40 patients with brain tumors, group 2 – 15 patients with communicating hydrocephalus, control group – 36 individuals. The patients underwent MRI with measurement and evaluation of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), the optochiasmal cistern and the pituitary gland vertical sizes, and tortuosity of the ON. Patients of the 2nd group underwent a phase-contrast MRI with an assessment of the velocity and volumetric characteristics of blood and cerebrospinal fluid flows with the calculation of the intracranial compliance index (ICC). Using the FreeSurfer program, the brain volumes were estimated. Results and discussion. A statistically significant increase in ONSD was found in the groups of patients compared with the control group (by 24 %, p < 0.05), decrease in the vertical size of the pituitary gland and an increase in the vertical size of the optochiasmal cistern (p < 0.05), as well as ICC lowering in group 2 (by 1.7 times, p < 0.05). Tortuosity of ON in group 1 was observed more often than in other groups. A statistically significant positive correlation between ONSD and brain volumes in group 1 (r = 0.55, p < 0.05) and a negative correlation between brain volumes and ICC in group 2 (r = –0.86, p < 0.05) has been found. Conclusions. Based on the presented results, we believe that the combined use of qualitative and quantitative MRI criteria can expand the diagnostic capabilities of non-invasive assessment of increased intracranial pressure.

1. Evensen K.B., Eide P.K. Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2020;17(1):34–65. doi: 10.1186/s12987-020-00195-3

2. Khan M.N., Shallwani H., Khan M.U., Shamim M.S. Noninvasive monitoring intracranial pressure: A review of available modalities. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2017;8:51–61. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_403_16

3. Raffiz M., Abdullah J.M. Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement: a means of detecting raised ICP in adult traumatic and non-traumatic neurosurgical patients. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2017;35(1):150–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.09.044

4. Harary M., Dolmans R.G.F., Gormley W.B. Intracranial pressure monitoring-review and avenues for development. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18(2):465–479. doi: 10.3390/s18020465

5. Çankaya I., Muluk N.B., Burulday V., Bilgili M.Y.K., Özdemir A. Noticable findings in cranial MRI of the patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy. 2022;36(4):415–422. doi: 10.1177/19458924211069213

6. Juhász J., Hensler J., Jansen O. MRI-findings in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (Pseudotumor cerebri). RoFo. 2021;193(11):1269–1276. doi: 10.1055/a1447-0264

7. Letyagin A.Yu., Borodin Yu.I. Evaluation of intracranial hypertension on data of ultra-high-field MRI. Sibirskij nauchnyj medicinskij zhurnal = Siberian Scientific Medical Journal. 2018;38(4):49–64. [in Russian] doi: 10.15372/SSMJ20180407

8. Saindane A.M., Lim P.P., Aiken A., Chen Z., Hudgins P.A. Factors determining the clinical significance of an “empty” sella turcica. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):1125–1131. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9013

9. Hoffmann J., Huppertz H.J., Schmidt C., Kunte H., Harms L., Klingebiel R., Wiener E. Morphometric and volumetric MRI changes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Cephalalgia. 2013;33(13):1075–1084. doi: 10.1177/0333102413484095

10. Passi N., Degnan A.J., Levy L.M. MR imaging of papilledema and visual pathways: effects of increased intracranial pressure and pathophysiologic mechanisms. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2013;34(5):919–924. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3022

11. Brodsky M.C., Vaphiades M. Magnetic resonance imaging in pseudotumor cerebri. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(9):1686–1693. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)99039-X

12. Greitz D. Cerebrospinal fluid circulation and associated intracranial dynamics. A radiologic investigation using MR imaging and radionuclide cisternography. Acta Radiol. Suppl. 1993;386:1–23.

13. Egnor M., Zheng L., Rosiello A., Gutman F., Davis R. A model of pulsations in communicating hydrocephalus. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2002;36(6):281–303. doi: 10.1159/000063533