Magnetic resonance imaging prospects of prognostic value in women pelvic pathology
https://doi.org/10.18699/SSMJ20210207
Abstract
Aim of the study was to estimate the prognostic value of perfusion and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods in systemic evaluation of perifocal changes of malignant masses in women’s pelvis. Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of MRI of the pelvic organs in women was performed on MRI scanners with a magnetic field of 1.5 T (Philips Achieva, Netherlands). The retrospective study included 1,5 T MRI of 530 women with pelvis pathology. It consists of 50 % (265 cases) of malignant pelvic mass and 50 % (265 cases) of non tumor pathologies. The most common malignant pathologies were regarded: rectum cancer (n=61), ovarian cancer (n=62), uterine cancer (n=65), cervical cancer (n=77). Group with non-tumor pathology was taken as comparison group and included inflammation (abscess), adhesions and other non-tumor pelvic pathologies (pseudocyst of peritoneum, hemorrhagic cyst, endometriosis). In all cases a body coil was used on pelvic region. MRI protocols included T2-, T1 – weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging, postcontrast T1 - weighted imaging. apparent diffusion coefficient value and perfusion value were estimated. Results and discussion. In intergroup comparison with systemic evaluation of MRI with ANOVA we revealed that the diffusion restriction and the apparent diffusion coefficient bear potential value for disease prognosis. Conclusions. MRI can be of value not only for evaluation of local spread, as well as providing wide opportunities for differential diagnosis and use of MRI as biomarker in some diseases. Such indications as restricted diffusion, apparent diffusion coefficient value and type of dynamic curve from perifocal lesion can benefit disease prognosis.
About the Authors
T. A. BergenRussian Federation
Tatyana A. Bergen, candidate of medical sciences
630055, Novosibirsk, Rechkunovskaya str., 15
I. A. Soynov
Russian Federation
Ilya A. Soynov, candidate of medical sciences
630055, Novosibirsk, Rechkunovskaya str., 15
V. A. Fokin
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Fokin, doctor of medical sciences
197341, Saint-Petersburg, Akkuratov str., 2
G. E. Trufanov
Russian Federation
Gennady E. Trufanov, doctor of medical sciences
197341, Saint-Petersburg, Akkuratov str., 2
References
1. Micco M., Sala E., Lakhman Yu., Hricak H., Vargars H. Imaging features of uncommon gynecologic cancers. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2015; 205 (6): 1346–1359. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12695
2. Багненко С.С., Труфанов Г.Е., Железняк И.С. Магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике очаговых поражений печени. Вестн. хирургии. 2016; 175 (3): 68–72. doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-3-68-72 Bagnenko S.S., Trufanov G.E., Zheleznyak I.S. MR-imaging in diagnostics of focal liver lesions. Vestnik khirurgii imeni Ivana Ivanovicha Grekova = Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2016; 175 (3): 68–72. [In Russian]. doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-3-68-72
3. Рубцова Н.А., Новикова Е.Г., Сыченкова И.Ю. Современные возможности магнитно-резонансной томографии в диагностике рака яичников. Исслед. и практ. в мед. 2017; 4 (1): 40–48. doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2017-4-1-5 Rubtsova N.A., Novikova E.G., Sychenkova I.Yu. Current possibilities of magnetic – resonance imaging in detection of ovarian cancer. Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine = Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2017; 4 (1): 40–48. [In Russian]. doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2017-4-1-5
4. Сергиеня О.В., Юхно Е.А., Павловская Е.А., Фокин В.А., Труфанов Г.Е. Возможности магнитнорезонансной томографии в визуализации структурных изменений органов малого таза у женщин репродуктивного возраста при бесплодии. Российский электронный журнал лучевой диагностики. 2018; 8 (1): 119–128. doi:10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-1-119-128 Sergienya O.V., Ukhno E.A., Pavlovskaya E.A., Fokin V.A., Trufanov G.E. Magnetic resonance imaging in visualization of structural changes in the pelvic organs in women of reproductive age with infertility. Rossiyskiy elektronnyy zhurnal luchevoy diagnostiki = Russian Electronic Journal of Radiation Diagnostics. 2018; 8 (1): 119–128. [In Russian]. doi: 10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-1-119-128
5. Balleyguier C., Sala E., da Cunha T., Bergman A., Brkljacic B., Danza F., Forstner R., Hamm B., Kubik-Huch R., Lopez C., Manfredi R., McHugo J., Oleaga L., Togashi K., Kinkel K. Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur. Radiol. 2011; 21 (5): 1102–1110. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1998-x
6. Taylor F.G., Quirke P., Heald R.J., Moran B.J., Blomqvist L., Swift I.R., Sebag-Montefiore D., Tekkis P., Brown G., Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer European Equivalence Study Study Group. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014; 32 (1): 34–43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3258
7. Märkl B., Rößle J., Arnholdt H.M. The clinical significance of lymph node size in colon cancer. Mod. Pathol. 2012; 25 (10): 1413–1422. doi: 10.1038/ modpathol.2012.92
8. Мищенко А.В., Дубицкий Д.Л., Носов А.К., Петров С.Б. Основы использования магнитно-резонансной томографии при раке предстательной железы. Луч. диагност. и терапия. 2014; (3): 12–26. doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2014-3-12-26. Mishchenko A.V., Dubitskii D.L., Nosov A.K., Petrov S.B. The basics of MRI of prostate cancer. Luchevaya diagnostika i terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2014; (3): 12–26. [In Russian]. doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2014-3-12-26