Capacity of flexible endoscopy in subepithelial esophageal tumors
https://doi.org/10.15372/SSMJ20200310
Abstract
Aim of the study was to investigate the results of endoscopic diagnostics and peroral operative endoscopy in subepithelial esophageal tumors. Material and methods. Data of 21 patients underwent flexible endoscopic interventions for subepithelial esophageal tumors (SET) from 2016 till 2019 were analyzed. Main endoscopic methods to reveal and characterize tumors preoperatively are examination in white light, narrow light spectrum imaging, radial endoscopic ultrasonographic scanning. Tumors from 8 till 40 mm in maximal dimension removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (2 tumors in 1 patient), tunnel dissection (13 cases) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (7 cases). The additional endoscopic ultrasonography was demanded intraoperatively in 2 cases of difficult tumor location and blurry visualization. Results and discussion. Subepithelial esophageal tumors are mainly diagnosed occasionally in patients without symptoms related to tumor. Suspicion of the tumor was based on routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Following endoscopic ultrasonography of planned esophageal segment allowed rejecting or confirming the lesion (21 patients), evaluating its echoscopic structure, size, growth direction, intramural location and connection to wall layers to make an assumption related to tumor morphology, to plan way of tumor removal. We choose interventions in depends on combination of available tumor features. Technical success of endoscopic interventions with use of flexible endoscope under this approach is noted in all the patients. So endoscopic methods are important for primary and detailed diagnostics and also effective for operative treatment in cases of appropriate indications.
About the Authors
I. E. SudovykhRussian Federation
Irina E. Sudovykh, candidate of medical sciences
630087, Novosibirsk, Nemirovicha-Danchenko str., 130
E. A. Drobyazgin
Russian Federation
Evgeni A. Drobyazgin, doctor of medical sciences
630087, Novosibirsk, Nemirovicha-Danchenko str., 130
630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny av., 52
Yu. V. Chikinev
Russian Federation
Yuri V. Chikinev, doctor of medical sciences, professor
630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny av., 52
References
1. Aoki T., Nakamura T., Oshikiri T., Hasegawa H., Yamamoto M., Matsuda Y., Kanaji S., Yamashita K., Matsuda T., Sumi Y., Suzuki S., Kakeji Y. Strategy for esophageal non-epithelial tumors based on a retrospective analysis of a single facility. Esophagus. 2018; 15 (4): 286–293. doi: 10.1007/s10388-018-0628-6
2. Codipilly D.C., Fang H., Alexander J.A., Katzka D.A., Ravi K. Subepithelial esophageal tumors: a single-center review of resected and surveilled lesions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2018; 87 (2): 370–377. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.043
3. Du C., Chai N.L., Ling-Hu E.Q., Li Z.J., Li L.S., Zou J.L., Jiang L., Lu Z.S., Meng J.Y., Tang P. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: An effective and safe therapy for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019; 25 (2): 245–257. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.245
4. Ko W.J., Song G.W., Cho J.Y. Evaluation and endoscopic management of esophageal submucosal tumor. Clinical Endoscopy. 2016; 50: 250. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.109
5. Li Z., Gao Y., Chai N., Xiong Y., Ma L., Zhang W., Du C., Linghu E. Effect of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for submucosal tumors at esophagogastric junction and risk factors for failure of en bloc resection. Surg. Endosc. 2018; 32 (3): 1326–1335. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5810-8
6. Pence K., Correa A.M., Chan E., Khaitan P., Hofstetter W., Kim M.P. Management of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: review of one hundred seven patients. Dis. Esophagus. 2017; 30 (12): 1–5. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox064
7. Wang Z., Zheng Z., Wang T., Wang X., Cao Y., Wang Y., Wang B. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of large submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in the esophagus and gastric cardia. Z. Gastroenterol. 2019; 57 (8): 952–959. doi: 10.1055/a-0905-3173