ENDOSIALOSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF SIALOLITHIASIS
https://doi.org/10.15372/SSMJ20200106
Abstract
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of endosialoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with sialolithiasis.
Material and methods. 106 clinical observations were analyzed in which computed tomography (multislice spiral computed tomography or cone-beam computed tomography) without contrast, salivary gland ultrasound and endosialoscopy were used to diagnose and treat patients with sialolithiasis. In the process of diagnostic sialoscopy, the patency of the ducts, the presence of strictures and dilatations, the condition of their walls, the severity of the vascular pattern, the integrity of the epithelial lining, the contents of the ducts, the presence of mucus, pus, and, of course, the presence of sialolites, their number, size, shape, density were evaluated.
Results and discussion. Endoscopy allows you to get unique information about sialolite and the state of the ductal apparatus, which determines the method of further treatment. Endosialoscopy can be used as a standard diagnostic method for suspected sialolithiasis and for the removal of sialolites (using endoscopic instruments) or as assistance. At the same time, diagnostic endosialoscopy is not an exhaustive method; therefore it should be carried out in conjunction with other methods – computed tomography or ultrasound of the salivary glands. The possibility of endoscopic sialolite removal depends on its mobility, size, location and condition of the duct. Attempts to capture and remove fixed sialolites, which are only partially visible and located in the deep sections of the salivary gland beyond the bend or stenosis section using endoscopic techniques, have been unsuccessful.
About the Authors
S. P. SysolyatinRussian Federation
doctor of medical sciences, professor
117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6
125252, Moscow, Berezovoy Roscchi dr., 12
K. A. Bannikova
Russian Federation
117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6
125252, Moscow, Berezovoy Roscchi dr., 12
P. G. Sysolyatin
Russian Federation
doctor of medical sciences, professor,
630087, Novosibirsk, Nemirovich-Danchenko str., 130
630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny av., 52
V. G. Gaytova
Russian Federation
117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6
O. D. Baydik
Russian Federation
doctor of medical sciences
634050, Tomsk, Moskovskiy path, 2
References
1. Bron L.P., O’Brien C.J. Facial nerve function after parotidectomy. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1997; 123: 1091–1096. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900100065009
2. Iro H., Zenk J., Koch M., Bozzato A. The Erlangen salivary gland project. Part I: Sialendoscopy in obstructive diseases of the major salivary glands. Tuttlinge: EndoPress, 2015. 60 p. doi: 10.1055/b-0034-92192
3. Katz P. New therapy for sialolithiasis. Inf. Dent. 1991; 73 (43): 3975–3979.
4. Koch M., Zenk J., Bozzatto A., Bumm K., Iro H. Sialoscopy in cases of unclear swelling of the major salivary glands. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2005; 133. (6): 863–868. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.005
5. Koch M., Zenk J., Iro H. Diagnostic and interventional sialoscopy in obstructive diseases of the salivary glands. HNO. 2007; 56 (2): 139–144. [In German]. doi: 10.1007/s00106-007-1563-3
6. Marchal F., Kurt M., Dulguerov P., Becker M., Oedman M., Lehmann W. Histopathology of submandibular glands removed for sialolithiasis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2001; 110 (5): 464–469. doi: 10.1177/000348940111000513
7. Marchal F., Dulguerov P., Becker M., Burke G., Disant F., Lehmann W. Submandibular diagnostic and interventional sialendoscopy: new procedure for ductal disorders. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2002; 111 (1): 27–35. doi: 10.1177/000348940211100105
8. Marchal F., Dulguerov P. Sialolithiasis management: the state of the art. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2003; 129 (9): 951–956. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.9.951
9. Marchal F. Salivary gland endoscopy: new limits? Revue de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale = Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2005; 106 (4): 244–249. [In French]. doi: STO-09-2005-106-4-0035-1768-101019-200514624
10. Nahlieli O., Iro H., McGurk M., Zeng J. Modern management preserving the salivary glands. Tel Aviv: Isradon, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.05.212.
11. Rzymska-Grala I., Stopa Z., Grala B., Gołę-biowski M., Wanyura H., Zuchowska A., Sawicka M., Zmorzyński M. Salivary gland calculi – contemporary methods of imaging. Pol. J. Radiol. 2010; 75 (3): 25–37.
12. Strychowsky J.E., Sommer D.D., Gupta M.K., Cohen N., Nahlieli O. Sialendoscopy for the management of obstructive salivary gland disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2012; 138 (6): 541–547. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2012.856
13. Vaiman M. Comparative analysis of methods of endoscopic surgery of the submandibular gland: 114 surgeries. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2015; 40. (2): 162–166. doi: 10.1111/coa.12357
14. Van den Akker H.P., Busemann-Sokole E. Submandibular gland function following transoral sialolithectomy. Oral Surg. 1983; 56: 351–356. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(83)90341-9
15. Zenk J., Koch M., Klintworth N., König B., Konz K., Gillespie M.B., Iro H. Sialendoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of sialolithiasis: a study on more than 1000 patients. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2012; 147. (5): 858–863. doi: 10.1177/0194599812452837
Review
For citations:
Sysolyatin S.P., Bannikova K.A., Sysolyatin P.G., Gaytova V.G., Baydik O.D. ENDOSIALOSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF SIALOLITHIASIS. Сибирский научный медицинский журнал. 2020;40(1):45-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15372/SSMJ20200106