ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PARAMETERS OF CENTRAL AORTIC PRESSURE, OFFICE AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE and INDICATORS OF TARGET ORGANS DAMAGE
https://doi.org/10.15372/SSMJ20190512
Abstract
Aim of the study was to investigate in a comparative manner associations between the parameters of central aortic pressure, office and ambulatory blood pressure with indicators of target organ damage. Material and methods. 47 consecutive outpatients and hospital patients (22 men and 25 women) aged 19–70 years were included in the open one-stage follow-up of a series of cases. The study program included anthropometry, measurement of office and ambulatory blood pressure, applanation tonometry of the radial artery, recording of resting ECG, echocardiography, biochemical blood analysis. In analyzing the data, the methods of descriptive statistics and the general linear model (GLM) were used. Results. Central aortic pressure is comparable to office blood pressure and, more than ambulatory blood pressure, was associated with indicators of left ventricular hypertrophy. Systolic central aortic pressure was associated with all electrocardiographic and echocardiographic indices used in the study. Of the central aortic pressure parameters characterizing the amplification and augmentation of the pulse wave, only non-augmented amplification of systolic pressure was associated with signs of left ventricular hypertrophy, but the amplification and augmentation of the pulse wave showed a sufficiently high degree of association with estimated glomerular filtration rate. Conclusion. The results of this study substantiate the relevance of using aortic pressure parameters in addition to traditional methods for determining blood pressure.
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out as part of the budget theme for State Assignment No. AAAA-А17-117112850280-2.
About the Authors
E. E. Tsvetkova
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine – Branch of Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of SB RAS
Russian Federation
630089, Novosibirsk, Boris Bogatkov str., 175/1
Russian Federation
630089, Novosibirsk, Boris Bogatkov str., 175/1
L. D. Latyntseva
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine – Branch of Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of SB RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
candidate of medical sciences
630089, Novosibirsk, Boris Bogatkov str., 175/1
A. A. Kuznetsov
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine – Branch of Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of SB RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doctor of medical sciences
630089, Novosibirsk, Boris Bogatkov str., 175/1
References
1. Kotovskaya Yu.V., Kobzev R.Yu., Safarova A.F., Mukhamedali P.K., Yurtaeva V.R., Kobalava Zh.D. Association between left ventricular myocardium mass and parameters of clinical, ambulatory and central blood pressure in young men. Arterial’naya gipertenziya = Arterial Hypertension. 2010; 16 (2): 150–155. [In Russian].
2. Tsvetkova E.E., Kuznetsov A.A., Denisova D.V., Ragino Yu.I., Voevoda M.I. Comparison of the association of brachial arterial pressure and parameters of central aortic pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy in the general population of Novosibirsk. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019; 24 (1): 18–22. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2019-1-18-22. [In Russian].
3. Agabiti-Rosei E., Mancia G., O’Rourke M.F., Roman M.J., Safar M.E., Smulyan H., Wang J.G., Wilkinson I.B., Williams B., Vlachopoulos C. Central blood pressure measurements and antihypertensive therapy: a consensus document. Hypertension. 2007; 50 (1): 154–160. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.090068.
4. Aparicio L.S., Barochiner J., Peuchot V.A., Giunta D.H., Martínez R., Morales M.S., Cuffaro P.E., Waisman G.D. Comparing office, central, home and ambulatory blood pressure in predicting left ventricular mass. Hipertens. Riesgo Vasc. 2019; 36 (1): 5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.hipert.2018.09.001.
5. Avolio A.P., van Bortel L.M., Boutouyrie P., Cockcroft J.R., McEniery C.M., Protogerou A.D., Roman M.J., Safar M.E., Segers P., Smulyan H. Role of pulse pressure amplification in arterial hypertension: experts’ opinion and review of the data. Hypertension. 2009; 54 (2): 375–383. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.134379.
6. Booysen H.L., Norton G.R., Maseko M.J., Libhaber C.D., Majane O.H., Sareli P., Woodiwiss A.J. Aortic, but not brachial blood pressure category enhances the ability to identify target organ changes in normotensives. J. Hypertens. 2013; 31 (6): 1124–1130. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328360802a.
7. Chi C., Yu X., Auckle R., Lu Y., Fan X., Yu S., Xiong J., Bai B., Teliewubai J., Zhou Y., Ji H., Li J., Zhang Y., Xu Y. Hypertensive target organ damage is better associated with central than brachial blood pressure: The Northern Shanghai Study. J. Clin. Hypertens. (Greenwich). 2017; 19 (12): 1269–1275. doi: 10.1111/jch.13110.
8. Fan F., Qi L., Jia J., Xu X., Liu Y., Yang Y., Qin X., Li J., Li H., Zhang Y., Huo Y. Noninvasive central systolic blood pressure is more strongly related to kidney function decline than peripheral systolic blood pressure in a Chinese community-based population. Hypertension. 2016; 67 (6): 1166–1172. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.07019.
9. Gubner R.S., Ungerlieder H.E. Electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy: factors determining the evolution of the electrocardiographic patterns in hypertrophy and bundle branch block. Arch. Intern. Med. (Chic.). 1943; 72 (2): 196–209. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1943.00210080052005.
10. Hallan S., Asberg A., Lindberg M., Johnsen H. Validation of the modification of diet in renal disease formula for estimating GFR with special emphasis on calibration of the serum creatinine assay. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2004; 44 (1): 84–93. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.03.027.
11. Huang C.M., Wang K.L., Cheng H.M., Chuang S.Y., Sung S.H., Yu W.C., Ting C.T., Lakatta E.G., Yin F.C., Chou P., Chen C.H. Central versus ambulatory blood pressure in the prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. J. Hypertens. 2011; 29 (3): 454–459. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283424b4d.
12. Kollias A., Lagou S., Zeniodi M.E., Boubouchairopoulou N., Stergiou G.S. Association of central versus brachial blood pressure with target-organ damage: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2016; 67 (1): 183–190. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06066.
13. Lekakis J.P., Zakopoulos N.A., Protogerou A.D., Kotsis V.T., Papaioannou T.G., Stamatelopoulos K.S., Tsitsiricos M.D., Pitiriga V.Ch., Papamichael C.M., Toumanides S.T., Mavrikakis M.E. Cardiac hypertrophy in hypertension: relation to 24-h blood pressure profile and arterial stiffness. Int. J . Cardiol. 2004; 97 (1): 29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.06.011.
14. Mancia G., Fagard R., Narkiewicz K., Redón J., Zanchetti A., Böhm M., Christiaens T., Cifkova R., de Backer G., Dominiczak A., Galderisi M., Grobbee D.E., Jaarsma T., Kirchhof P., Kjeldsen S.E., Laurent S., Manolis A.J., Nilsson P.M., Ruilope L.M., Schmieder R.E., Sirnes P.A., Sleight P., Viigimaa M., Waeber B., Zannad F. Task Force Members. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J. Hypertens. 2013; 31 (7): 1281–1357. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc.
15. McEniery C.M., Cockcroft J.R., Roman M.J., Franklin S.S., Wilkinson I.B. Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance. Eur. Heart J. 2014; 35 (26): 1719–1725. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht565.
16. Mitchell G.F. Effects of central arterial aging on the structure and function of the peripheral vasculature: implications for end-organ damage. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985). 2008; 105 (5): 1652–1660. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90549.2008.
17. Neisius U., Bilo G., Taurino C., McClure J.D., Schneider M.P., Kawecka-Jaszcz K., Stolarz-Skrzypek K., Klima Ł., Staessen J.A., Kuznetsova T., Redon J., Martinez F., Rosei E.A., Muiesan M.L., Melander O., Zannad F., Rossignol P., Laurent S., Collin C., Lonati L., Zanchetti A., Dominiczak A.F., Delles C. Association of central and peripheral pulse pressure with intermediate cardiovascular phenotypes. J. Hypertens. 2012; 30 (1): 67–74. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834e12d8.
18. Shimizu M., Hoshide S., Ishikawa J., Yano Y., Eguchi K., Kario K. Correlation of central blood pressure to hypertensive target organ damages during antihypertensive treatment: The J-TOP study. Am. J. Hypertens. 2015; 28 (8): 980–986. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu250.
19. Sokolow M., Lyon T.P. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar and limb leads. Am. Heart J. 1949; 37 (2): 161–186. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(49)90562-1.
20. Wang K.L., Cheng H.M., Chuang S.Y., Spurgeon H.A., Ting C.T., Lakatta E.G., Yin F.C., Chou P., Chen C.H. Central or peripheral systolic or pulse pressure: which best relates to target organs and future mortality? J. Hypertens. 2009; 27 (3): 461–467. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283220ea4.
21. Yamashita S., Dohi Y., Takase H., Sugiura T., Ohte N. Central blood pressure reflects left ventricular load, while brachial blood pressure reflects arterial damage. Blood Press. 2014; 23 (6): 356–362. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2014.923250.
Review
For citations:
Tsvetkova E.E., Latyntseva L.D., Kuznetsov A.A. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PARAMETERS OF CENTRAL AORTIC PRESSURE, OFFICE AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE and INDICATORS OF TARGET ORGANS DAMAGE. Сибирский научный медицинский журнал. 2019;39(5):102-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15372/SSMJ20190512
Views:
210
Email this article 