Preview

Сибирский научный медицинский журнал

Advanced search

Study of the dynamics of changes in functional brain networks in the early recovery period of ischemic stroke according to MRI data

https://doi.org/10.18699/SSMJ20260106

Abstract

Aim of the study was to evaluate the dynamics of changes in functional brain networks (default mode network, DMN, and sensorimotor network, SMN) during the early recovery period following ischemic stroke, taking into account the volume of ischemic lesions according to MRI data. Material and methods. A dynamic MRI study of the brain was performed on a 3.0 T scanner in 137 patients at 1–3 days, 7–10 days, and 3–4 months after the onset of acute cerebrovascular accident, using a routine protocol (DWI-EPI, FLAIR-SPIR, T2-WI, T1W-TFE) supplemented with resting-state functional MRI. Additional assessment included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the modified Rankin scale. The study cohort comprised 36 patients diagnosed with acute ischemic supratentorial stroke who underwent at least two MRI examinations. Results and discussion. A trend (p > 0.05) towards increased functional connectivity between DMN and SMN regions was observed from the first to the third examination. The MoCA results (p < 0.05 for 2nd and 3rd study compared to 1st) showed improvement in cognitive functions over time, consistent with the clinical course. The most significant finding of the correlation analysis was a direct correlation between DMN and SMN connectivity at the first observation (R = 0.57; p = 0.006). Lesion volume was found to influence functional connectivity, with a significant effect of larger lesion size on DMN recovery dynamics (R = 0.83; p = 0.04). Conclusions. A parallel increase in intra-network connectivity of the DMN and SMN was demonstrated, indicating systemic functional reorganization of the brain following acute stroke. During the early recovery period, resting-state functional MRI revealed progressive restoration of DMN and SMN connectivity, accompanied by cognitive improvement as assessed by MoCA. Further research is required to clarify the mechanisms of DMN and SMN recovery, as well as the role of lesion volume and localization in functional network reorganization.

About the Authors

O. V. Zudilina
International Tomography Center of SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Olga V. Zudilina

630090, Novosibirsk, Institutskaya st., 3a; 630090, Novosibirsk, Pirogova st., 1



V. V. Popov
International Tomography Center of SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Popov

630090, Novosibirsk, Institutskaya st., 3a; 630090, Novosibirsk, Pirogova st., 1



E. D. Petrovskiy
International Tomography Center of SB RAS
Russian Federation

Evgeniy D. Petrovskiy

630090, Novosibirsk, Institutskaya st., 3a



Yu. A. Stankevich
International Tomography Center of SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Stankevich - candidate of medical sciences.

630090, Novosibirsk, Institutskaya st., 3a; 630090, Novosibirsk, Pirogova st., 1



A. A. Tulupov
International Tomography Center of SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Andrey A. Tulupov - doctor of medical sciences, professor, corresponding member of RAS.

630090, Novosibirsk, Institutskaya st., 3a; 630090, Novosibirsk, Pirogova st., 1



References

1. Xiucai G., Ziping Z., Xueyan Y., QirongXu, Feng L., Feng Z. Global burden of ischemic stroke attributable to high body mass index in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2021. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2024;24,584. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04259-2

2. Ignatyeva V.I., Voznyuk I.A., Shamalov N.A., Reznik A.V., Vinitskiy A.A., Derkach E.V. Social and economic burden of stroke in Russian Federation. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni Sergeya Sergeevicha Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(8–2):5–15. [In Russian]. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20231230825

3. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795–820. doi: 10.1016/S14744422(21)00252-0

4. Nuvakhova M.B. Rehabilitation of patients with cognitive impairment after stroke during the late recovery period. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni Sergeya Sergeevicha Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2021;121(8–2):76–85. [In Russian]. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112108276

5. Alawieh A., Zhao J., Feng W. Factors affecting post-stroke motor recovery: Implications on neurotherapy after brain injury. Behav Brain Res. 2018;340:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.08.029

6. Zhivolupov S.A., Voznyuk I.A., Samartsev I.N., Kravchuk A.Yu., Bondarenko Zh.E. Adaptive neuroplasticity after ischemic brain damage and its contribution to the recovery of patients after stroke: Theoretical prerequisites for effective neuroreabilitation. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya = Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2020;16(31):24–38. [In Russian]. doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2020-16-31-24-38

7. Crofts A., Kelly M.E., Gibson C.L. Imaging functional recovery following ischemic stroke: Clinical and preclinical fMRI studies. J. Neuroimaging. 2020;30(1):514. doi: 10.1111/jon.12668

8. Yamashita K.I., Uehara T., Taniwaki Y., Tobimatsu S., Kira J.I. Long-term effect of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on the dorsal attention network of Alzheimer’s disease patients: A pilot study using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:810206. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.810206

9. Has Silemek A.C., Chen H., Sati P., Gao W. The brain’s first “traffic map” through Unified Structural and Functional Connectivity (USFC) modeling. Commun. Biol. 2024;7(1):1477. doi: 10.1038/s42003024-07160-y

10. Stankevich Yu.A., Popov V.V., Bogomyakova O.B., Vasil’kiv L.M., Tulupov A.A., Sagdeev R.Z. Visualization of brain neuroplasticity in the aspect of post-stroke rehabilitation. Kompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevaniy = Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2024;13(4):214–228. [In Russian]. doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2024-13-4-214-228

11. Alves P.N., Foulon C., Karolis V., Bzdok D., Margulies D.S., Volle E., Thiebaut de Schotten M. An improved neuroanatomical model of the default-mode network reconciles previous neuroimaging and neuropathological findings. Commun. Biol. 2019;2:370. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0611-3.

12. Menon V. 20 years of the default mode network: A review and synthesis. Neuron. 2023;111(16):2469– 2487. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.023.

13. Smallwood J., Bernhardt B.C., Leech R., Bzdok D., Jefferies E., Margulies D.S. The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021;22(8):503–513. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00474-4

14. Caspers J., Rubbert C., Eickhoff S.B., Hoffstaedter F., Südmeyer M., Hartmann C.J., Sigl B., Teichert N., Aissa J., Turowski B., Schnitzler A., Mathys C. Withinand across-network alterations of the sensorimotor network in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroradiology. 2021;63(12):2073–2085. doi: 10.1007/s00234021-02731-w

15. Hans J.D. Clinical neuroanatomy: Brain circuitry and its disorders. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer, 2020. 981p.

16. Nasreddine Z.S., Phillips N.A., Bedirian V., Charbonneau S., Whitehead V., Collin I., Cummings J.L., Chertkow H. The Montreal CognitiveAssessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x

17. Suponeva N.A., Yusupova D.G., Zhirova E.S., Melchenko D.A., Taratukhina A.S., Butkovskaya A.A., Ilyina K.A., Zaitsev A.B., Zimin A.A., Klochkov A.S., Lyukmanov R.Kh., Kalinkina M.E., Piradov M.A., Kotov-Smolensky A.M., Khizhnikova A.E. Validation of the modified Rankin Scale in Russia. Nevrologiya, neyropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2018;10(4):36–39. [In Russian]. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2018-4-36-39

18. Wu L., Wang X., Liu Q., Chai L., Tian S., Wu W. A study on alterations in functional activity in migraineurs during the interictal period. Heliyon. 2022;9(1):e12372. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12372

19. Miao J., Tantawi M., Alizadeh M., Thalheimer S., Vedaei F., Romo V., Mohamed F.B., Wu C. Characteristic dynamic functional connectivity during sevoflurane-induced general anesthesia. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):21014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43832-1

20. Parsons N., Bowden S.C., Vogrin S., D’Souza W.J. Default mode network dysfunction in idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2020;159:106254. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106254.

21. Borserio B.J., Sharpley C.F., Bitsika V., Sarmukadam K., Fourie P.J., Agnew L.L. Default mode network activity in depression subtypes. Rev. Neurosci. 2021;32(6):597–613. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2020-0132.

22. Cassady K., Gagnon H., Freiburger E., Lalwani P., Simmonite M., Park D.C., Peltier S.J., Taylor S.F., Weissman D.H., Seidler R.D., Polk T.A. Network segregation varies with neural distinctiveness sensorimotor cortex. Neuroimage. 2020;212:116663. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116663

23. Tumati S., Paulus M.P., Northoff G. Out-ofstep: brain-heart desynchronization in anxiety disorders. Mol. Psychiatry. 2021;26(6):1726–1737. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01029-w

24. Stern E.R., Eng G.K., de Nadai A.S., Iosifescu D.V., Tobe R.H., Collins K.A. Imbalance between default mode and sensorimotor connectivity is associated with perseverative thinking in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Transl. Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01780-w

25. Wu C.W., Lin S.N., Hsu L.M., Yeh S.C., Guu S.F., Lee S.H., Chen C.C. Synchrony between default-mode and sensorimotor networks facilitates motor function in stroke rehabilitation: A pilot fMRI study. Front. Neurosci. 2020;14:548. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00548

26. Boren S.B., Savitz S.I., Ellmore T.M., Arevalo O.D., Aronowski J., Silos C., George S., Haque M.E. Longitudinal resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study: A seed-based connectivity biomarker in patients with ischemic and intracerebral hemorrhage stroke. Brain Connect. 2023;13(8):498–507. doi: 10.1089/brain.2022.0017

27. Chen H., Shi M., Zhang H., Zhang Y.D., Geng W., Jiang L., Wang Z., Chen Y.C., Yin X. Different patterns of functional connectivity alterations within the default-mode network and sensorimotor network in basal ganglia and pontine stroke. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019;25:9585–9593. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918185

28. Koukalova L., Chmelova M., Amlerova Z., Vargova L. Out of the core: the impact of focal ischemia in regions beyond the penumbra. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2024;18:1336886. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1336886.

29. Gusev E.I., Konovalov A.N., Gekht A.B. Neurology. National Guidelines. Concise Edition. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2018. 688 p. [In Russian].

30. Dobryakova E., Smith D.V. Reward enhances connectivity between the ventral striatum and the default mode network. Neuroimage. 2022;258:119398. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119398

31. Hofmann V., Geurten B.R.H., Sanguinetti-Scheck J.I., Gamez-Sena L., Engelmann J. Motor patterns during active electrosensory acquisition. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2014;8:186. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00186

32. Vicentini J.E., Weiler M., Casseb R.F., Almeida S.R., Valler L., de Campos B.M., Li L.M. Subacute functional connectivity correlates with cognitive recovery six months after stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;29:102538. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102538.

33. Bain K.A., Kosik K.B., Terada M., Gribble P.A., Johnson N.F. Contralateral thalamocortical connectivity is related to postural control in the uninvolved limb of older adults with history of ankle sprain. Gait Posture. 2024;109:115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.01.015

34. Aderinto N., AbdulBasit M.O., Olatunji G., Adejumo T. Exploring the transformative influence of neuroplasticity on stroke rehabilitation: a narrative review of current evidence. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.). 2023;85(9):4425‒4432. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001137

35. van der Laag P.J., Wondergem R., Pisters M.F. Movement behavior patterns composition remains stable, but individuals change their movement behavior pattern over time in people with a first-ever stroke. Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act. 2022;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s11556-022-00290-4

36. Levin O.S., Bogolepova A.N. Poststroke motor and cognitive impairments: clinical features and current approaches to rehabilitation. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni Sergeya Sergeevicha Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020;120(11):99107. [In Russian]. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202012011199

37. Kotov S.V., Borisova V.A., Slyunkova E.V., Isakova E.V., Kiselev A.V., Kotov A.S. Dynamics of recovery of cognitive deficit in patients in the early recovery period of ischemic stroke. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni Sergeya Sergeevicha Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2021;121(11):26–32. [In Russian]. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112111126

38. Liu C., Zhang S., Yao Y., Su C., Wang Z., Wang M., Zhu W. Associations between diffusion dynamics and functional outcome in acute and early subacute ischemic stroke. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2020;30(3):517–524. doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00812-1


Review

Views: 341

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2512 (Print)
ISSN 2410-2520 (Online)