Preview

Сибирский научный медицинский журнал

Advanced search

Investigation of the morphofunctional status of macrophages in abdominal adhesions in rats and on exposure to oxidized dextran

https://doi.org/10.18699/SSMJ20250210

Abstract

Abdominal adhesions result from the organization of fibrinous exudate and subsequent fibrosis, attributed to the low phagocytic activity of macrophages associated with their M1 phenotype. Oxidized dextran (OD) can limit the development of fibrosis by exerting a stimulating effect on phagocytosis.
The aim of the study is to investigate the morphofunctional status of macrophages during the formation of abdominal adhesions in an experimental model and under exposure to OD.
Material and methods. In male Wistar rats (n = 30), the adhesive process in the abdominal cavity was simulated. The animals were divided into 3 groups: group 1 – control, with adhesions in the abdominal cavity; group 2 rats were injected once with 2 ml of OD 5 % aqueous solution; the 3rd group consisted of intact animals. The rats were removed from the experiment on the 7th and 21st days. Histological immunohistochemical (Il-10, IFNγ, Il-1, TNFα, TGF-β) and electron microscopic study of abdominal adhesions, morphometry of structures were performed.
Results and discussion. Macrophages in adhesions of group 1 and 2 rats were larger, compared to those in intact animals. On days 7 and 21 macrophages in group 2 rats were 19 % and 2.5 times larger, respectively, compared to group 1 animals, contained in the cytoplasm a greater number of phagosomes, phagolysosomes and rough endoplasmic reticulum, by the 21st day nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio was shifted towards the cytoplasm. The expression of IFNγ in the infiltrates of adhesions in group 2 rats increased 3,2-fold, indicating greater phagocytotic activity of macrophages. The expression of IL-10 and TGFβ on the 7th and 21st days was represented in a larger number of macrophages of group 2 than group 1 rats (2.7 and 4.1 times, respectively), but IL-1 and TNFα ‒ in a smaller number (4.6 and 3.2 times, respectively), which corresponded to the phenotypic characteristics of M2 macrophages.
Conclusions. The population of macrophages in inflammatory infiltrates of abdominal adhesions is heterogeneous, there are signs of M1 and M2 type. Under the influence of OD, the phagocytic activity of M2 type macrophages increases, preventing the formation of adhesions.

About the Authors

M. A. Karpov
Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine; Novosibirsk State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

 Mikhail A. Karpov, candidate of medical sciences 

630060, Novosibirsk, Timakova st., 2

630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny ave., 52



A. P. Nadeev
Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine; Novosibirsk State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

 Aleksandr P. Nadeev, doctor of medical sciences, professor 

630060, Novosibirsk, Timakova st., 2

630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny ave., 52



V. A. Shkurupiy
Novosibirsk State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

 Vyacheslav A. Shkurupiy, doctor of medical sciences, professor, academician of the RAS 

 630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny ave., 52 



N. P. Bgatova
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology – Branch of the Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
Russian Federation

 Nataliya P. Bgatova, doctor of biological sciences, professor 

630117, Novosibirsk, Arbuzova st., 6



A. V. Basova
Novosibirsk State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

 Anastasiya V. Basova 

 630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny ave., 52 



M. A. Volchek
Novosibirsk State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

 Mariya A. Volchek 

 630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny ave., 52 



A. V. Volchek
Novosibirsk State Medical University of Minzdrav of Russia
Russian Federation

 Aleksandr V. Volchek 

 630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny ave., 52 



References

1. Wiseman D. Advances, retreats and challenges in adhesions research. Innova. 2016;2(3):7–29. doi: 10.21626/innova/2016.2/01

2. Samartsev V.A., Gavrilov V.A., Pushkarev B.S., Parshakov A.A., Kuznetsova M.P., Kuznetsova M.V. Peritoneal adhesion: state of issue and modern methods of prevention. Permskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Perm Medical Journal. 2019;36(3):72–90. [In Russian]. doi: 10.17816/pmj36372-90

3. Liu X.R., Liu F., Li Z.W., Liu X.Y., Zhang W., Peng D. The risk of postoperative complications is higher in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2023;25(12):3471–3478. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03210-9

4. Ito T., Shintani Y., Fields L., Shiraishi M., Podaru M.N., Kainuma S., Yamashita K., Kobayashi K., Perretti M., Lewis-McDougall F., Suzuki K. Cell barrier function of resident peritoneal macrophages in postoperative adhesions. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):2232. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22536-y

5. Inal A., Saydam S. Effect of intraperitoneal and systemic sirolimus administration on postoperative peritoneal adhesions in rats. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences. 2021;5(3):195–200. doi: 10.30621/jbachs.977476

6. Haney A.F. Identification of macrophages at the site of peritoneal injury: evidence supporting a direct role for peritoneal macrophages in healing injured peritoneum. Fertil. Steril. 2000;73(5):988–995. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00490-8

7. Sahputra R., Dejyong K., Woolf A.S., Mack M., Allen J.E., Rückerl D., Herrick S.E. Monocyte-derived peritoneal macrophages protect C57BL/6 mice against surgery-induced adhesions. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:1000491. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1000491

8. Skalsky S., Sokolova T. Reactivity of the macrophage system in adhesion formation. Vrach = The Doctor. 2018;29(5):81–83. [In Russian]. doi: 10.29296/25877305-2018-05-19

9. Dremina N.N., Shurygin M.G., Chepurnykh E.E., Shurygina I.A. Role of growth factors in the adhesive process in the abdominal cavity. Acta Biomed. Sci. 2019; 4(5): 98–103. [In Russian]. doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019-4.5.16

10. Strizova Z., Benesova I., Bartolini R., Novysedlak R., Cecrdlova E., Foley L.K., Striz I. M1/M2 macrophages and their overlaps – myth or reality? Clin. Sci. (Lond). 2023;137(15):1067–1093. doi: 10.1042/CS20220531

11. Fedorov A.A., Ermak N.A., Gerashchenko T.S., Topolnitskiy E.B., Shefer N.A., Rodionov E.O., Stakheeva M.N. Polarization of macrophages: mechanisms, markers and factors of induction. Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal = Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2022;21(4):124–136. [In Russian]. doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2022-21-4-124-136

12. Rumyantsev V.A., Shimansky Sh.L., Gasparyan M.G., Asayan A.G., Ryаbikov M.D., Moiseev D.A., Yusupova Yu.I. Influence of macrophage reprogramming biotechnologyon the initiated inflammatory reaction in the periodont of mice (pilot study). Vyatskiy meditsinskiy vestnik = Vyatka Medical Bulletin. 2019;(2):56–60. [In Russian].

13. Rumyantsev V.A., Denis A.G., Shimansky Sh.L., Shestakova V.G., Donskov S.A., Blinova A.V. Morphological changes in periodontal tissues under the influence of clinical methods of reprogramming macrophages. Golova i sheya = Head and Neck. 2022;10(4):8–15 [In Russian]. doi: 10.25792/HN.2022.10.4.8–15

14. Kishore A., Petrek M. Roles of macrophage polarization and macrophage-derived miRNAs in pulmonary fibrosis. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:678457. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.678457

15. Lu Y., Wang Y., Wang Y., Wu Y., Huang Y., Liu X., Zhang S., Zhong S., Li Y., Li B., … Zhou H. M1-like macrophages modulate fibrosis and inflammation of orbital fibroblasts in Graves’ orbitopathy: Potential relevance to soluble interleukin-6 receptor. Thyroid. 2023;33(3):338–350. doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0254

16. Karpov M.A., Shkurupiy V.A., Troitskii A.V. The ctudy of efficiency of the approach to prevent the adhesions in the abdominal cavity of rats. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2021;171(4):416–420. doi: 10.1007/s10517-021-05240-1

17. Zharkov A.S., Shkurupiy V.A., Glazev D.Yu., Belyaev V.N., Frolov A.V. Method for obtaining oxidized dextran. Patent 2592617 RF; published 27.07.2016. [In Russian].

18. Ayushinova N.I., Shurygina I.A., Grigoriev E.G., Shurygin M.G. Inducement of experimental abdominal adhesions (literature review). Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2018;3(6):107–113. [In Russian]. doi 10.29413/ABS.2018-3.6.15

19. Lu X., Ding Y.J., Wang Y., Hong X.D., Fei Y.H.H., Si T.T., Wu J.F., Zhou Y., Chen A.F., Zhang X.D., Jin J. Macrophage M2 polarisation empowered reduction of abdominal adhesions via recombinant human type III collagen. Surgical Practice. 2024;28(4):209–215. doi: 10.1111/1744-1633.12714

20. Lutskii A.A., Zhirkov A.A., Lobzin D.Yu., Rao M., Alekseeva L.A., Maeurer M., Lobzin Yu.V. Interferon-γ: biological function and application for study of cellular immune response. Zhurnal infektologii = Journal of Infectology. 2015;7(4):10–22. [In Russian]. doi: 10.22625/2072-6732-2015-7-4-10-22


Review

Views: 695


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2512 (Print)
ISSN 2410-2520 (Online)